Within academia, duplicity often takes the form of "self-plagiarism" or "text recycling." This occurs when an author reuses their own previously published work without disclosure.
Should I focus more on (like Othello ) or scientific ethics ? Duplicity
In a physical setting, subtle cues like body language and tone often betray a liar. In the digital realm, these "fine-grained" characteristics are absent, creating a "moral distance" between the user and their actions. Within academia, duplicity often takes the form of
: Tools like Crossref or Turnitin are now standard for identifying overlapping content. Experts suggest that "text recycling" is a more accurate term than "self-plagiarism," as it acknowledges that some reuse is not intended to deceive. III. The New Frontier: Artificial Deception the ethical "recycling" of academic work
: While republishing an entire paper is a clear violation, reusing technical descriptions in a "Method" section is often seen as necessary for consistency.
Is this for a or professional audience? Self-Plagiarism in Scientific Writing
Duplicity, the act of deceptive double-dealing or "doubleness" of thought, has long been a fixture of human interaction. From the Machiavellian schemes of Shakespeare’s Iago to the tactical indirection of modern political soundbites, humans have a storied history of saying one thing while meaning another. However, the rise of digital platforms and generative AI has fundamentally altered the scale and nature of these deceptions. This paper explores how duplicity manifests in online behaviors, the ethical "recycling" of academic work, and the emerging threat of AI-driven deception. I. The Psychology of Online Duplicity